Peter Shaffer’s fatal flaw

He wrote some of the most successful plays of the last 50 years, including “Amadeus” and “Equus”. But Peter Shaffer had one major weakness: he wasn’t very good with words

By Irving Wardle

The plays of Peter Shaffer, who died this month at the age of 90, will be remembered for some of the most audacious and visually imperishable events of the postwar British theatre. It is hard to think of any stage images to rank, say, with the modulation of the Inca masks from hope to tragic mourning at the end of “The Royal Hunt of the Sun”, or the transformation of actors into equine divinities in “Equus”. Playwriting, however, is a matter of words; and what you remember from these and other wonderful examples of Shaffer’s work is not the words but the pictures.

In the mid-fifties, when the art of playwriting was being widely re-invented, he made a thoroughly conventional start with a West End family comedy, “Five Finger Exercise” (1958). Immediately evident were its structural expertise, its deep affinity to music, and the weakness of its expressive language. All his subsequent work was conditioned by this frustrating trio of qualities. Shaffer knew his intended destination, but it was equally clear that he was not going to get there unaided. It was his great stroke of luck to find creative partners who helped him to work out the route.

More from 1843 magazine

1843 magazine | Rahul Gandhi is on the march. But where is he heading?

He wants to be the champion of Indian liberalism. First he needs to save his party from irrelevance

1843 magazine | It began as a rewilding experiment. Now a bear is on trial for murder

The death of a jogger in the Italian Alps has sparked a furious debate about the relationship between humans and nature


1843 magazine | “We have to make Biden lose”: Arab-Americans are switching to Trump

Anger over Gaza in the swing state of Michigan might cost the president the election